Skip to content
DigiDubs

BMS

FLAGSHIP

Every requirement found, every claim evidenced, before you decide to bid.

BMS turns a tender package into a requirement inventory, checks each requirement against your company facts, links every claim you make to a document that proves it, and records who decided to bid and why. It prepares and validates the submission package. It does not submit — that happens on the government portal, by your team, as it always has.

Tender package — PDF, DOCX, XLSX, scans1What is being asked?Tender decomposed into requirements2Do we qualify?Checked against your company facts3Can we prove it?Every claim linked to an evidence object4Should we bid?A human decides, and it is recordedHUMANYou submit, on the government portalBMS prepares, validates and evidences the package. It never submits it.

What it does

It reads the tender so nothing is missed.

PDFs, scanned PDFs, DOCX, XLSX, images and the complex tables inside them, decomposed into a requirement inventory with each item typed, marked mandatory or not, and traced back to the clause it came from. A corrigendum creates a new version rather than overwriting one: deadlines are superseded, never deleted, and the requirements it touched are re-checked.

It answers "do we qualify" with arithmetic, not judgement.

Turnover floors, experience thresholds, dates, certifications — each requirement is evaluated against your company master and returns pass, fail, conditional or review, per requirement and overall. Where a value cannot be computed it says so and asks a person instead of guessing. A close semantic match never overrides a numeric threshold.

Every claim points at the document that proves it.

Credentials, work orders, financials and CVs live as evidence objects with validity dates and verification status. A claim in your proposal is marked supported, partially supported, unsupported, contradicted or not verifiable, and only a supported claim — or one a named person authorised — goes into the bid.

Policy findings arrive with the provision attached.

Findings cite the rule, its version and its effective date, and read "consistent" or "inconsistent with" rather than passing legal judgement. Every retrieval carries a trust tier, so you can see whether an answer came from the tender itself, a gazette, an official manual or an external reference before you rely on it.

Pricing

Single team

Talk to us

Bidding teams
One
Policy corpus
GFR and DoE manuals
Evidence vault
Included
Deployment
Managed cloud

Multi-team

MOST CHOSEN

Talk to us

Bidding teams
Several, isolated
Policy corpus
Above, plus state packs
Consortium and JV
Partner and MAF tracking
Governance
Configurable approval gates

Sovereign

Talk to us

Deployment
Your infrastructure
Data residency
Your choice
Corpus
Your verified additions
Support
A named engineer

Tenant isolation is enforced at the database rather than in the application. Original tender documents are hashed and immutable, and superseded versions are preserved rather than replaced. Every consequential decision records the identity of the person who made it. AI output is never itself a decision: confidence is metadata, and the compliance path never runs on bare vector search.

Book a demo

Thirty minutes, your data, our screen.

The next step

Worth buying, or worth building around?

The audit answers that before you subscribe to anything. Two weeks, a fixed fee, and a ranked map of what would pay for itself first — including the case where the answer is not this product.

Book an AI Audit

We use analytics to see which pages work. No ad trackers, no selling data.

Details